lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:43:45 -0700
From:   Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To:     Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:     Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        LKML <Linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kan Liang <kan.liang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] perf vendor events: Update CascadelakeX events to v1.08

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:36 AM Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
>
> > Thanks, it now works, but then... You forgot to add the Cc: entries for
> > all the people in your actual e-mail Cc: list, and also the
> > Reviewed-by: from Andy, I had to do it all manually, so when I applied
> > your attachments with 'git am' I needed to go on and manually collect
> > all the Cc, Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags.
>
> For the event updates we should just use git pulls in my opinion.
>
> They are just too large for the normal review procedures, and usually
> don't really benefit much from community review anyways because they
> are essentially hardware documentation.
>
> Should just name intel / amd / etc. event list maintainers and you
> could accept pulls from them.
>
> -Andi

Are the scripts to make the json available? Perhaps then Arnaldo could
generate the changes.

I believe Kajol Jain has some unmerged changes because there's a worry
about the interaction with the scripts and assumptions in jevents.
Having access to the scripts would mean that we could fix whatever
issues there would be.

Thanks,
Ian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ