[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200925220536.GG3674@minyard.net>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 17:05:36 -0500
From: Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Bug with data getting dropped on a pty
I've been trying to track down a bug in a library I support (named
gensio; it does all kinds of stream I/O) and I have figured out that
the problem is not in the library, it's in the kernel. I have
attached a reproducer program, more on how to run it later.
Basically, if you have a pty master and do the following:
write(ptym, data, size);
close(ptym);
The other end will occasionally not get the first 4095 bytes of data,
but it will get byte 4095 and on. This only happens on SMP systems; I
couldn't reproduce with just one processor. (Running under qemu I
have seen it drop 2048 bytes, but it has always been 4095 outside of a
VM.) I have tested on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x86_64, the base 5.4 kernel, on a
raspberry pi running raspian, 5.4.51 kernel, and the latest on the
master branch of Linus' tree running under qemu on x86_64.
I have never seen it fail going the other way (writing to the slave
and reading from the master) and that's part of the test suite.
I'm ok with it not getting any of the data, I'm ok with it getting
some of the data at the beginning, but dropping a chunk of the data
and getting later data is a problem.
I've looked at the pty and tty code and I haven't found anything
obvious, but I haven't looked that hard and I don't know that code
very well.
To run the reproducer:
gcc -g -o testpty testpty.c
ulimit -c unlimited
while ./testpty; do echo pass; done
It should fail pretty quickly; it asserts when it detects the error.
You can load the core dump into the debugger. Note that I wasn't able
to reproduce running it in the debugger.
In the debugger, you can back up to the assert and look at the readbuf:
(gdb) x/30xb readbuf
0x559e5e9c6080 <readbuf>: 0xff 0x08 0x00 0x08 0x01 0x08 0x02 0x08
0x559e5e9c6088 <readbuf+8>: 0x03 0x08 0x04 0x08 0x05 0x08 0x06 0x08
0x559e5e9c6090 <readbuf+16>: 0x07 0x08 0x08 0x08 0x09 0x08 0x0a 0x08
0x559e5e9c6098 <readbuf+24>: 0x0b 0x08 0x0c 0x08 0x0d 0x08
verses the data that was sent:
0x559e5e9b6080 <data>: 0x00 0x00 0x00 0x01 0x00 0x02 0x00 0x03
0x559e5e9b6088 <data+8>: 0x00 0x04 0x00 0x05 0x00 0x06 0x00 0x07
0x559e5e9b6090 <data+16>: 0x00 0x08 0x00 0x09 0x00 0x0a 0x00 0x0b
0x559e5e9b6098 <data+24>: 0x00 0x0c 0x00 0x0d 0x00 0x0e
The data is two byte big endian numbers ascending, the data in readbuf
that was read by the reader thread is the data starting at position
4095 in the data buffer that was transmitted. Since n_tty has a 4096
byte buffer, that's somewhat suspicious.
Though the reproducer always fails on the first buffer, the test
program I had would close in random places, it would fail at places
besides the beginning of the buffer.
I searched and I couldn't find any error report on this.
-corey
View attachment "testpty.c" of type "text/x-csrc" (2557 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists