[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200925070707.GB16872@zn.tnic>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 09:07:07 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Punit Agrawal <punit1.agrawal@...hiba.co.jp>
Cc: Smita Koralahalli Channabasappa <skoralah@....com>,
Smita Koralahalli <Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...ica.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] cper, apei, mce: Pass x86 CPER through the MCA
handling chain
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 09:54:06AM +0900, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Maybe I could've used a better choice of words - I meant to define a
> structure with meaningful member names to replace the *(ptr + i)
> accesses in the patch.
I know exactly what you mean - I had the same question during last
review.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists