[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJsYDVLaw_ViJECoX8VxtrhCDg7m-fOZ0XmF1+n9Y13oVgd4oQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 16:21:43 +0800
From: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
To: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/Mediatek SoC support"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/6] spi: spi-mtk-nor: use dma_alloc_coherent() for
bounce buffer
Hi!
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 2:56 PM Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Use dma_alloc_coherent() for bounce buffer instead of kmalloc() to
> make sure the bounce buffer to be allocated within its DMAable range.
I think the introduction of need_bounce can be in its own commit or
at least mentioned here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ikjoon Jang <ikjn@...omium.org>
>
> ---
>
> (no changes since v1)
There have been a lot of changes since v2 :)
Reviewed-by: Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>
--
Regards,
Chuanhong Guo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists