linux-kernel - possible deadlock in x25

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <000000000000b9cf7105b01f60a5@google.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 01:48:16 -0700
From:   syzbot <syzbot+1e6138e3196ac80e99b8@...kaller.appspotmail.com>
To:     andrew.hendry@...il.com, davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-x25@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com,
        tanxin.ctf@...il.com, xiyuyang19@...an.edu.cn,
        yuehaibing@...wei.com
Subject: possible deadlock in x25_disconnect

Hello,

syzbot found the following issue on:

HEAD commit:    77972b55 Revert "ravb: Fixed to be able to unload modules"
git tree:       net
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=110cf809900000
kernel config:  https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=5f4c828c9e3cef97
dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=1e6138e3196ac80e99b8
compiler:       gcc (GCC) 10.1.0-syz 20200507

Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet.

IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
Reported-by: syzbot+1e6138e3196ac80e99b8@...kaller.appspotmail.com

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
--------------------------------------------
syz-executor.1/12065 is trying to acquire lock:
ffffffff8b2e7318 (x25_list_lock){++..}-{2:2}, at: x25_disconnect+0x279/0x3e0 net/x25/x25_subr.c:361

but task is already holding lock:
ffffffff8b2e7318 (x25_list_lock){++..}-{2:2}, at: x25_kill_by_device net/x25/af_x25.c:209 [inline]
ffffffff8b2e7318 (x25_list_lock){++..}-{2:2}, at: x25_device_event+0x1bf/0x300 net/x25/af_x25.c:247

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(x25_list_lock);
  lock(x25_list_lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

2 locks held by syz-executor.1/12065:
 #0: ffffffff8b148f28 (rtnl_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: dev_ioctl+0x1a3/0xc40 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:510
 #1: ffffffff8b2e7318 (x25_list_lock){++..}-{2:2}, at: x25_kill_by_device net/x25/af_x25.c:209 [inline]
 #1: ffffffff8b2e7318 (x25_list_lock){++..}-{2:2}, at: x25_device_event+0x1bf/0x300 net/x25/af_x25.c:247

stack backtrace:
CPU: 0 PID: 12065 Comm: syz-executor.1 Not tainted 5.9.0-rc6-syzkaller #0
Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
Call Trace:
 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:77 [inline]
 dump_stack+0x198/0x1fd lib/dump_stack.c:118
 print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2391 [inline]
 check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2432 [inline]
 validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3202 [inline]
 __lock_acquire.cold+0x148/0x3b0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4441
 lock_acquire+0x1f3/0xaf0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5029
 __raw_read_lock_bh include/linux/rwlock_api_smp.h:176 [inline]
 _raw_read_lock_bh+0x32/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:247
 x25_disconnect+0x279/0x3e0 net/x25/x25_subr.c:361
 x25_kill_by_device net/x25/af_x25.c:213 [inline]
 x25_device_event+0x27c/0x300 net/x25/af_x25.c:247
 notifier_call_chain+0xb5/0x200 kernel/notifier.c:83
 call_netdevice_notifiers_info+0xb5/0x130 net/core/dev.c:2033
 call_netdevice_notifiers_extack net/core/dev.c:2045 [inline]
 call_netdevice_notifiers net/core/dev.c:2059 [inline]
 __dev_notify_flags+0x1da/0x2b0 net/core/dev.c:8325
 dev_change_flags+0x100/0x160 net/core/dev.c:8361
 dev_ifsioc+0x210/0xa70 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:265
 dev_ioctl+0x1b1/0xc40 net/core/dev_ioctl.c:511
 sock_do_ioctl+0x148/0x2d0 net/socket.c:1070
 sock_ioctl+0x3b8/0x730 net/socket.c:1198
 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:48 [inline]
 __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:753 [inline]
 __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:739 [inline]
 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x193/0x200 fs/ioctl.c:739
 do_syscall_64+0x2d/0x70 arch/x86/entry/common.c:46
 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
RIP: 0033:0x45e179
Code: 3d b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 66 90 48 89 f8 48 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d 01 f0 ff ff 0f 83 0b b2 fb ff c3 66 2e 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00
RSP: 002b:00007f623a794c78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000010
RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 0000000000015740 RCX: 000000000045e179
RDX: 0000000020000140 RSI: 0000000000008914 RDI: 0000000000000004
RBP: 000000000118cf80 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000118cf4c
R13: 00007ffc0abd13ff R14: 00007f623a7959c0 R15: 000000000118cf4c


---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@...glegroups.com.

syzbot will keep track of this issue. See:
https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot.