| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200925101558.GB4846@gaia>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 11:15:58 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Elena Petrova <lenaptr@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 24/39] arm64: mte: Add in-kernel MTE helpers
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50:31AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> index 035003acfa87..bc0dc66a6a27 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/esr.h
> @@ -103,6 +103,7 @@
> #define ESR_ELx_FSC (0x3F)
> #define ESR_ELx_FSC_TYPE (0x3C)
> #define ESR_ELx_FSC_EXTABT (0x10)
> +#define ESR_ELx_FSC_MTE (0x11)
> #define ESR_ELx_FSC_SERROR (0x11)
> #define ESR_ELx_FSC_ACCESS (0x08)
> #define ESR_ELx_FSC_FAULT (0x04)
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-kasan.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-kasan.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..b0f27de8de33
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte-kasan.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 */
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2020 ARM Ltd.
> + */
> +#ifndef __ASM_MTE_ASM_H
> +#define __ASM_MTE_ASM_H
> +
> +#include <asm/compiler.h>
> +
> +#define __MTE_PREAMBLE ARM64_ASM_PREAMBLE ".arch_extension memtag\n"
Can this not live in mte.h?
> +#define MTE_GRANULE_SIZE UL(16)
> +#define MTE_GRANULE_MASK (~(MTE_GRANULE_SIZE - 1))
> +#define MTE_TAG_SHIFT 56
> +#define MTE_TAG_SIZE 4
> +#define MTE_TAG_MASK GENMASK((MTE_TAG_SHIFT + (MTE_TAG_SIZE - 1)), MTE_TAG_SHIFT)
> +#define MTE_TAG_MAX (MTE_TAG_MASK >> MTE_TAG_SHIFT)
I'd still like these MTE_* macros in a separate mte-hwdef.h file. The
only reason I see they were not in mte.h is because they need to be
included in asm/cache.h. They are not KASAN specific.
> +
> +#ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
> +
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_MTE
> +
> +static inline u8 mte_get_ptr_tag(void *ptr)
> +{
> + u8 tag = (u8)(((u64)(ptr)) >> MTE_TAG_SHIFT);
> +
> + return tag;
> +}
So this returns the top 8 bits of the address (i.e. no masking with
MTE_TAG_MASK). Fine by me.
> +
> +u8 mte_get_mem_tag(void *addr);
> +u8 mte_get_random_tag(void);
> +void *mte_set_mem_tag_range(void *addr, size_t size, u8 tag);
> +
> +#else /* CONFIG_ARM64_MTE */
> +
> +static inline u8 mte_get_ptr_tag(void *ptr)
> +{
> + return 0xFF;
> +}
> +
> +static inline u8 mte_get_mem_tag(void *addr)
> +{
> + return 0xFF;
> +}
> +static inline u8 mte_get_random_tag(void)
> +{
> + return 0xFF;
> +}
> +static inline void *mte_set_mem_tag_range(void *addr, size_t size, u8 tag)
> +{
> + return addr;
> +}
Maybe these can stay in mte-kasan.h, although they are not a direct
interface for KASAN AFAICT (the arch_* equivalent are defined in
asm/memory.h. If there's no good reason, we could move them to mte.h.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h
> index 1c99fcadb58c..3a2bf3ccb26c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mte.h
> @@ -5,14 +5,13 @@
> #ifndef __ASM_MTE_H
> #define __ASM_MTE_H
>
> -#define MTE_GRANULE_SIZE UL(16)
> -#define MTE_GRANULE_MASK (~(MTE_GRANULE_SIZE - 1))
> -#define MTE_TAG_SHIFT 56
> -#define MTE_TAG_SIZE 4
> +#include <asm/mte-kasan.h>
>
> #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
>
> +#include <linux/bitfield.h>
> #include <linux/page-flags.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
>
> #include <asm/pgtable-types.h>
>
> @@ -45,7 +44,9 @@ long get_mte_ctrl(struct task_struct *task);
> int mte_ptrace_copy_tags(struct task_struct *child, long request,
> unsigned long addr, unsigned long data);
>
> -#else
> +void mte_assign_mem_tag_range(void *addr, size_t size);
So mte_set_mem_tag_range() is KASAN specific but
mte_assign_mem_tag_range() is not. Slightly confusing.
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> index 52a0638ed967..833b63fdd5e2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/mte.c
> @@ -13,8 +13,10 @@
> #include <linux/swap.h>
> #include <linux/swapops.h>
> #include <linux/thread_info.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> #include <linux/uio.h>
>
> +#include <asm/barrier.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> #include <asm/mte.h>
> #include <asm/ptrace.h>
> @@ -72,6 +74,48 @@ int memcmp_pages(struct page *page1, struct page *page2)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +u8 mte_get_mem_tag(void *addr)
> +{
> + if (!system_supports_mte())
> + return 0xFF;
> +
> + asm volatile(__MTE_PREAMBLE "ldg %0, [%0]"
> + : "+r" (addr));
Nitpick: do we need volatile or plain asm would do?
I wonder whether we'd need the "memory" clobber. I don't see how this
would fail though, maybe later on with stack tagging if the compiler
writes tags behind our back.
> +
> + return 0xF0 | mte_get_ptr_tag(addr);
Since mte_get_ptr_tag() returns the top byte of the address, we don't
need the additional 0xF0 or'ing. LDG only sets bits 59:56.
> +}
> +
> +u8 mte_get_random_tag(void)
> +{
> + void *addr;
> +
> + if (!system_supports_mte())
> + return 0xFF;
> +
> + asm volatile(__MTE_PREAMBLE "irg %0, %0"
> + : "+r" (addr));
> +
> + return 0xF0 | mte_get_ptr_tag(addr);
Same here.
> +}
> +
> +void *mte_set_mem_tag_range(void *addr, size_t size, u8 tag)
> +{
> + void *ptr = addr;
> +
> + if ((!system_supports_mte()) || (size == 0))
> + return addr;
> +
> + /* Make sure that size is aligned. */
> + WARN_ON(size & (MTE_GRANULE_SIZE - 1));
Doesn't the address need to be aligned as well?
> +
> + tag = 0xF0 | tag;
> + ptr = (void *)__tag_set(ptr, tag);
> +
> + mte_assign_mem_tag_range(ptr, size);
> +
> + return ptr;
> +}
> +
> static void update_sctlr_el1_tcf0(u64 tcf0)
> {
> /* ISB required for the kernel uaccess routines */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/lib/mte.S b/arch/arm64/lib/mte.S
> index 03ca6d8b8670..aa0ab01252fe 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/lib/mte.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/lib/mte.S
> @@ -149,3 +149,22 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(mte_restore_page_tags)
>
> ret
> SYM_FUNC_END(mte_restore_page_tags)
> +
> +/*
> + * Assign allocation tags for a region of memory based on the pointer tag
> + * x0 - source pointer
> + * x1 - size
> + *
> + * Note: size must be non-zero and MTE_GRANULE_SIZE aligned
Doesn't the address need to be aligned as well?
> + */
> +SYM_FUNC_START(mte_assign_mem_tag_range)
> + /* if (src == NULL) return; */
> + cbz x0, 2f
> + /* if (size == 0) return; */
> + cbz x1, 2f
I find these checks unnecessary, as I said a couple of times before,
just document the function pre-conditions. They are also incomplete
(i.e. you check for NULL but not alignment).
> +1: stg x0, [x0]
> + add x0, x0, #MTE_GRANULE_SIZE
> + subs x1, x1, #MTE_GRANULE_SIZE
> + b.gt 1b
> +2: ret
> +SYM_FUNC_END(mte_assign_mem_tag_range)
> --
> 2.28.0.681.g6f77f65b4e-goog
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists