[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200925112722.GA4841@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:27:22 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
"Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
Hongxiang Lou <louhongxiang@...wei.com>,
Linux NFS Mailing List <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] nfs: remove incorrect fallthrough label
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 02:11:59PM -0400, Anna Schumaker wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 2:08 PM Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > Real reason why not:
> I'm planning to take this patch through the NFS tree for 5.10 (along
> with the patch that apparently causes the problem). I didn't think it
> was urgent so I haven't gotten around to pushing it out yet, but I'll
> do so in the next few hours.
FWIW NFS is quite widely used by CI systems so any build breaks with it
in -next have a pretty big knock on effect on testing, even beyond the
distruption people working on the build test side of things.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists