[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200925113748.GG4846@gaia>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 12:37:49 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Cc: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Elena Petrova <lenaptr@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 30/39] arm64: kasan: Enable TBI EL1
On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 12:50:37AM +0200, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> index 12ba98bc3b3f..dce06e553c7c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/proc.S
> @@ -40,9 +40,13 @@
> #define TCR_CACHE_FLAGS TCR_IRGN_WBWA | TCR_ORGN_WBWA
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_SW_TAGS
> -#define TCR_KASAN_FLAGS TCR_TBI1
> +#define TCR_KASAN_SW_FLAGS TCR_TBI1
> #else
> -#define TCR_KASAN_FLAGS 0
> +#define TCR_KASAN_SW_FLAGS 0
> +#endif
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
> +#define TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS TCR_TBI1
> #endif
>
> /*
> @@ -454,6 +458,9 @@ SYM_FUNC_START(__cpu_setup)
>
> /* set the TCR_EL1 bits */
> orr mte_tcr, mte_tcr, #SYS_TCR_EL1_TCMA1
> +#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN_HW_TAGS
> + orr mte_tcr, mte_tcr, #TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS
> +#endif
I missed this in an earlier patch. Do we need TCMA1 set without
KASAN_HW? If not, we could add them both to TCR_KASAN_HW_FLAGS.
--
Catalin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists