linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/9] sched: Migrate disable support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d26d81ec-01d6-f6c0-816b-fbd8bb71e132@arm.com>
Date:   Fri, 25 Sep 2020 13:58:06 +0200
From:   Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        bigeasy@...utronix.de, qais.yousef@....com, swood@...hat.com,
        valentin.schneider@....com, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
        vincent.guittot@...aro.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com,
        vincent.donnefort@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] sched: Migrate disable support

On 25/09/2020 12:10, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 11:12:09AM +0200, Dietmar Eggemann wrote:
> 
>> I get this when running 6 (periodic) RT50 tasks with CPU hp stress on my
>> 6 CPU JUNO board (!CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT).
>>
>> [   55.490263] ------------[ cut here ]------------
>> [   55.505261] Modules linked in:
>> [   55.508322] CPU: 3 PID: 24 Comm: migration/3 Not tainted
>> 5.9.0-rc1-00132-gc096e6406c50-dirty #90
>> [   55.517119] Hardware name: ARM Juno development board (r0) (DT)
>> [   55.523058] Stopper: multi_cpu_stop+0x0/0x170 <- 0x0
>> [   55.528029] pstate: 20000085 (nzCv daIf -PAN -UAO BTYPE=--)
>> [   55.533612] pc : sched_cpu_dying+0x124/0x130
>> [   55.537887] lr : sched_cpu_dying+0xd8/0x130
>> [   55.542071] sp : ffff800011f0bca0
>> [   55.545385] x29: ffff800011f0bca0 x28: 0000000000000002
>> [   55.550703] x27: 0000000000000000 x26: 0000000000000060
>> [   55.556022] x25: 0000000000000000 x24: 0000000000000001
>> [   55.561340] x23: 0000000000000000 x22: 0000000000000003
>> [   55.566659] x21: 0000000000000080 x20: 0000000000000003
>> [   55.571977] x19: ffff00097ef9e1c0 x18: 0000000000000010
>> [   55.577295] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 0000000000000000
>> [   55.582613] x15: 0000000000000000 x14: 000000000000015c
>> [   55.587932] x13: 0000000000000000 x12: 00000000000006f1
>> [   55.593250] x11: 0000000000000080 x10: 0000000000000000
>> [   55.598567] x9 : 0000000000000003 x8 : ffff0009743f5900
>> [   55.603886] x7 : 0000000000000003 x6 : 0000000000000000
>> [   55.609204] x5 : 0000000000000001 x4 : 0000000000000002
>> [   55.614521] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : 0000000000000013
>> [   55.619839] x1 : 0000000000000008 x0 : 0000000000000003
>> [   55.625158] Call trace:
>> [   55.627607]  sched_cpu_dying+0x124/0x130
>> [   55.631535]  cpuhp_invoke_callback+0x88/0x210
>> [   55.635897]  take_cpu_down+0x7c/0xd8
>> [   55.639475]  multi_cpu_stop+0xac/0x170
>> [   55.643227]  cpu_stopper_thread+0x98/0x130
>> [   55.647327]  smpboot_thread_fn+0x1c4/0x280
>> [   55.651427]  kthread+0x140/0x160
>> [   55.654658]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x34
>> [   55.658239] Code: f000e1c1 913fc021 1400034a 17ffffde (d4210000)
>> [   55.664342] ---[ end trace c5b8988b7b701e56 ]---
>> [   55.668963] note: migration/3[24] exited with preempt_count 3
>>
>> 7309 int sched_cpu_dying(unsigned int cpu)
>>     ...
>>     BUG_ON(rq->nr_running != 1 || rq_has_pinned_tasks(rq));
>>     ...
>>
>> rq->nr_running is always 2 here in this cases.
>>
>> balance_hotplug_wait and sched_cpu_wait_empty run in cpuhp/X (CFS)
>> whereas sched_cpu_dying in migration/X ?
> 
> takedown_cpu() has:
> 
>   kthread_park(per_cpu_ptr(&cpuhp_state, cpu)->thread);
> 
> before calling:
> 
>   err = stop_machine_cpuslocked(take_cpu_down, NULL, cpumask_of(cpu));
> 
> So when we get to sched_cpu_dying(), the only task that _should_ still
> be there is migration/X.
> 
> Do you have any idea what thread, other than migration/X, is still
> active on that CPU? per sched_cpu_wait_empty() we should've pushed out
> all userspace tasks, and the cpu hotplug machinery should've put all the
> per-cpu kthreads to sleep at this point.

With Valentin's print_rq() inspired test snippet I always see one of the
RT user tasks as the second guy? BTW, it has to be RT tasks, never
triggered with CFS tasks.

[   57.849268] CPU2 nr_running=2
[   57.852241]  p=migration/2
[   57.854967]  p=task0-0