[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200925140930.z6yvqvm6crrq5k3a@Rk>
Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 22:09:30 +0800
From: Coiby Xu <coiby.xu@...il.com>
To: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Cc: devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
"moderated list:GREYBUS SUBSYSTEM" <greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [greybus-dev] [PATCH 1/3] [PATCH] staging: greybus: fix warnings
about endianness detected by sparse
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 07:50:57AM -0500, Alex Elder wrote:
>On 9/24/20 5:20 AM, Coiby Xu wrote:
>> This patch fix the following warnings from sparse,
>
>You need to address Greg's comment.
>
>But in general this looks good. I have one comment below, which
>you can address in v2. If you (or others) disagree with it, I'm
>fine with your code as-is. Either way, you can add this:
>
>Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>
Thank you fore reviewing this patch!
>
>> $ make C=2 drivers/staging/greybus/
>> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_module.c:222:25: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
>> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_module.c:222:25: expected restricted __le16 [usertype] data_cport
>> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_module.c:222:25: got unsigned short [usertype] intf_cport_id
>> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c:460:40: warning: restricted __le32 degrades to integer
>> drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c:691:41: warning: incorrect type in assignment (different base types)
>
>. . .
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
>> index 83b38ae8908c..56bf1a4f95ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/audio_topology.c
>> @@ -466,7 +466,7 @@ static int gbcodec_mixer_dapm_ctl_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> goto exit;
>>
>> /* update ucontrol */
>> - if (gbvalue.value.integer_value[0] != val) {
>> + if (gbvalue.value.integer_value[0] != cpu_to_le32(val)) {
>
>It's equivalent, but I have a small preference to convert
>the value from gbvalue into CPU byte order rather than
>what you have here.
Thank you for the suggestion! I'll use CPU byte order when submitting
next version.
>
>> for (wi = 0; wi < wlist->num_widgets; wi++) {
>> widget = wlist->widgets[wi];
>> snd_soc_dapm_mixer_update_power(widget->dapm, kcontrol,
>> @@ -689,7 +689,7 @@ static int gbaudio_tplg_create_kcontrol(struct gbaudio_module_info *gb,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> ctldata->ctl_id = ctl->id;
>> ctldata->data_cport = le16_to_cpu(ctl->data_cport);
>> - ctldata->access = ctl->access;
>> + ctldata->access = le32_to_cpu(ctl->access);
>> ctldata->vcount = ctl->count_values;
>> ctldata->info = &ctl->info;
>> *kctl = (struct snd_kcontrol_new)
>> @@ -744,10 +744,10 @@ static int gbcodec_enum_dapm_ctl_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> return ret;
>> }
>>
>> - ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[0];
>> + ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0] = le32_to_cpu(gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[0]);
>> if (e->shift_l != e->shift_r)
>> ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] =
>> - gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[1];
>> + le32_to_cpu(gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[1]);
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> @@ -801,10 +801,10 @@ static int gbcodec_enum_dapm_ctl_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> mask = e->mask << e->shift_l;
>>
>> if (gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[0] !=
>> - ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]) {
>> + cpu_to_le32(ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0])) {
>> change = 1;
>> gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[0] =
>> - ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0];
>> + cpu_to_le32(ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[0]);
>> }
>>
>> if (e->shift_l != e->shift_r) {
>> @@ -813,10 +813,10 @@ static int gbcodec_enum_dapm_ctl_put(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
>> val |= ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1] << e->shift_r;
>> mask |= e->mask << e->shift_r;
>> if (gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[1] !=
>> - ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1]) {
>> + cpu_to_le32(ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1])) {
>> change = 1;
>> gbvalue.value.enumerated_item[1] =
>> - ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1];
>> + cpu_to_le32(ucontrol->value.enumerated.item[1]);
>> }
>> }
>>
>> @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static int gbaudio_tplg_create_mixer_ctl(struct gbaudio_module_info *gb,
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> ctldata->ctl_id = ctl->id;
>> ctldata->data_cport = le16_to_cpu(ctl->data_cport);
>> - ctldata->access = ctl->access;
>> + ctldata->access = le32_to_cpu(ctl->access);
>> ctldata->vcount = ctl->count_values;
>> ctldata->info = &ctl->info;
>> *kctl = (struct snd_kcontrol_new)
>>
>
--
Best regards,
Coiby
Powered by blists - more mailing lists