linux-kernel - Re: remove alloc_vm

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 26 Sep 2020 08:29:59 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
        Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
        Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
        Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
        Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@...el.com>,
        Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>, x86@...nel.org,
        xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: remove alloc_vm_area v2

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 07:43:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 15:58:42 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
> 
> > this series removes alloc_vm_area, which was left over from the big
> > vmalloc interface rework.  It is a rather arkane interface, basicaly
> > the equivalent of get_vm_area + actually faulting in all PTEs in
> > the allocated area.  It was originally addeds for Xen (which isn't
> > modular to start with), and then grew users in zsmalloc and i915
> > which seems to mostly qualify as abuses of the interface, especially
> > for i915 as a random driver should not set up PTE bits directly.
> > 
> > Note that the i915 patches apply to the drm-tip branch of the drm-tip
> > tree, as that tree has recent conflicting commits in the same area.
> 
> Is the drm-tip material in linux-next yet?  I'm still seeing a non-trivial
> reject in there at present.

I assumed it was, but the reject imply that they aren't.  Tvrtko, do you
know the details?