[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c7745e5b-767a-01ce-23db-076df8160ddd@redhat.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2020 02:45:06 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
Peter Feiner <pfeiner@...gle.com>,
Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@...il.com>,
Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@...il.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 16/22] kvm: mmu: Add dirty logging handler for changed
sptes
On 25/09/20 23:22, Ben Gardon wrote:
> +static void handle_changed_spte_dlog(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
> + u64 old_spte, u64 new_spte, int level)
> +{
> + bool pfn_changed;
> + struct kvm_memory_slot *slot;
_dlog is a new abbreviation... I think I prefer the full _dirty_log,
it's not any longer than _acc_track.
I wonder if it's worth trying to commonize code between the TDP MMU,
mmu_spte_update and fast_pf_fix_direct_spte. But that can be left for
later since this is only a first step.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists