linux-kernel - Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in bit

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200926193957.GA1033221@PWN>
Date:   Sat, 26 Sep 2020 15:39:57 -0400
From:   Peilin Ye <yepeilin.cs@...il.com>
To:     Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc:     syzbot <syzbot+b308f5fd049fbbc6e74f@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch, deller@....de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jirislaby@...nel.org,
        syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        yepeilin.cs@...il.com
Subject: Re: KASAN: use-after-free Read in bit_putcs

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 01:25:17AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> A simplified reproducer and debug printk() patch shown below reported that
> vc_font.height is increased to 9 via ioctl(VT_RESIZEX) after it was once
> decreased from 16 to 2 via ioctl(PIO_FONT).
> 
> 
> 
> Since vc_resize() with v.v_rows == 0 preserves current vc->vc_rows value,
> this reproducer is bypassing
> 
> 	if (v.v_clin) {
> 		int rows = v.v_vlin / v.v_clin;
> 		if (v.v_rows != rows) {
> 			if (v.v_rows) /* Parameters don't add up */
> 				return -EINVAL;
> 			v.v_rows = rows;
> 		}
> 	}
> 
> check by setting v.v_vlin == 1 and v.v_clin == 9.
> 
> If v.v_vcol > 0 and v.v_vcol != vc->vc_cols (though this reproducer is passing
> v.v_vcol == 0), tty_do_resize() from vc_do_resize() from vc_resize() can make
> "struct tty_struct"->winsize.ws_ypixel = 1 despite
> "struct tty_struct"->winsize.vc->vc_rows = vc->vc_rows (which is usually larger
> than 1). Does such winsize (a row has 1 / vc->vc_rows pixel) make sense?
> 
> 
> 
> Since I don't know the meaning of "struct vt_consize"->v_clin (which is commented
> with "/* number of pixel rows per character */" but does it mean font size ?),
> I don't know why we can assign that value to vcp->vc_font.height via
> 
> 	if (v.v_clin)
> 		vcp->vc_font.height = v.v_clin;
> 
> in vt_resizex(). While ioctl(PIO_FONT) needs to pass vc->vc_sw->con_font_set()
> check in con_font_set(), ioctl(VT_RESIZEX) does not pass it in vt_resizex()...
> 
> Since this problem does not happen if I remove
> 
> 	if (v.v_clin)
> 		vcp->vc_font.height = v.v_clin;

Hi Tetsuo!

>  from vt_resizex(), I guess that some variables are getting confused by change
> of vc->vc_font.height ...

Yes, see bit_putcs():

(drivers/video/fbdev/core/bitblit.c)
static void bit_putcs(struct vc_data *vc, struct fb_info *info,
		      const unsigned short *s, int count, int yy, int xx,
		      int fg, int bg)
{
	struct fb_image image;
	u32 width = DIV_ROUND_UP(vc->vc_font.width, 8);
	u32 cellsize = width * vc->vc_font.height;
	    ^^^^^^^^		   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

`cellsize` is now too large. Later, in bit_putcs_aligned():

	while (cnt--) {
		src = vc->vc_font.data + (scr_readw(s++)&
					  charmask)*cellsize;
						    ^^^^^^^^

`src` goes out of bounds of the data buffer. At first glance I guess
this is an out-of-bound read reported as a use-after-free read? The
crashlog says:

[  149.732103][ T6693] Allocated by task 6667:
[ 149.732115][ T6693] kasan_save_stack (mm/kasan/common.c:48)
[ 149.732121][ T6693] __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0 (mm/kasan/common.c:56 mm/kasan/common.c:461)
[ 149.732126][ T6693] __kmalloc (mm/slab.c:3656 mm/slab.c:3664)
[ 149.732133][ T6693] alloc_pipe_info (fs/pipe.c:810)
[ 149.732139][ T6693] create_pipe_files (fs/pipe.c:883 fs/pipe.c:914)
[ 149.732145][ T6693] do_pipe2 (fs/pipe.c:965 fs/pipe.c:1012)

I'm not sure, but I don't think a buffer allocated in fs/pipe.c is
related here. Maybe they just live near each other on the heap?

To resolve this out-of-bound issue for now, I think the easiest way
is to add a range check in bit_putcs(), or bit_putcs_aligned().

...but yeah, that `VT_RESIZEX` ioctl looks really buggy, and is already
causing more issues:

KASAN: global-out-of-bounds Read in fbcon_get_font
Link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=08b8be45afea11888776f897895aef9ad1c3ecfd

This was also caused by `VT_RESIZEX`...

Thank you,
Peilin Ye