linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: megaraid_sas: simplify compat

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a01930JPMj6ie=9+GtvRQThPzxH0_ge+OWydcZd7qRkSA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 26 Sep 2020 23:19:36 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:     Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@...adcom.com>,
        Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@...adcom.com>,
        Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@...adcom.com>,
        "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Anand Lodnoor <anand.lodnoor@...adcom.com>,
        megaraidlinux.pdl@...adcom.com,
        linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] scsi: megaraid_sas: simplify compat_ioctl handling

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 7:26 AM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:15:43PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > @@ -8279,16 +8279,18 @@ megasas_mgmt_fw_ioctl(struct megasas_instance *instance,
> >        * copy out the sense
> >        */
> >       if (ioc->sense_len) {
> > +             void __user *uptr;
> >               /*
> >                * sense_ptr points to the location that has the user
> >                * sense buffer address
> >                */
> > +             sense_ptr = (void *)ioc->frame.raw + ioc->sense_off;
> > +             if (in_compat_syscall())
> > +                     uptr = compat_ptr(get_unaligned((u32 *)sense_ptr));
>
> should the u32 * here by a compat_uptr *? Not tat it would make a
> difference, just better document what we are doing.

Ok, changed now. The longer type name leads to a slightly ugly
line break, but you are right that is is the correct thing to do.

> > +     for (i = 0; i < MAX_IOCTL_SGE; i++) {
> > +             compat_uptr_t iov_base;
> > +             if (get_user(iov_base, &cioc->sgl[i].iov_base) ||
> > +                 get_user(ioc->sgl[i].iov_len, &cioc->sgl[i].iov_len)) {
> > +                     goto out;
> > +             }
>
> I don't think we need the braces here.

ok.

> > +     return ioc;
> > +out:
> > +     kfree(ioc);
> > +
> > +     return ERR_PTR(err);
>
> spurious empty line.

ok

     Arnd