lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sun, 27 Sep 2020 12:28:48 +0200
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
Cc:     sudeep.dutt@...el.com, ashutosh.dixit@...el.com, arnd@...db.de,
        masahiroy@...nel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
        lee.jones@...aro.org, rikard.falkeborn@...il.com, mst@...hat.co,
        bp@...e.de, jhugo@...eaurora.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        manivannan.sadhasivam@...aro.org, mgross@...ux.intel.com,
        pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, linux-imx@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mic: vop: fix a written error in MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE

On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 03:31:56PM +0800, Sherry Sun wrote:
> For vop bus, the first parameter should be vop in MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Sherry Sun <sherry.sun@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>
> ---
>  drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c b/drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c
> index d609f0dc6124..589425fa78d4 100644
> --- a/drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/misc/mic/vop/vop_main.c
> @@ -796,7 +796,7 @@ static struct vop_driver vop_driver = {
>  
>  module_vop_driver(vop_driver);
>  
> -MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(mbus, id_table);
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vop, id_table);
>  MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel(R) Virtio Over PCIe (VOP) driver");
>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");

Doesn't this have to go _after_ the MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(vop...) support,
which you add in patch 2 of this series?

Does this patch here break the build?  If not, how is it working?

And if you only have one vop driver, why do you need autoloading for it?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ