linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] serial: 8250_dw: Fix clk-notifier/port suspend deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e508b9c8-bcc4-00a6-0ca0-0b4a0c34f626@redhat.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Sep 2020 17:01:52 +0200
From:   Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To:     Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>,
        Alexey Malahov <Alexey.Malahov@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Pavel Parkhomenko <Pavel.Parkhomenko@...kalelectronics.ru>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] serial: 8250_dw: Fix clk-notifier/port suspend
 deadlock

Hi,

On 9/23/20 6:19 PM, Serge Semin wrote:
> Hans has discovered that there is a potential deadlock between the ref
> clock change notifier and the port suspension procedures {see the link at
> the bottom of the letter}. Indeed the deadlock is possible if the port
> suspension is initiated during the ref clock rate change:
> 
>      CPU0 (suspend CPU/UART)   CPU1 (update clock)
>               ----                    ----
>      lock(&port->mutex);
>                                lock((work_completion)(&data->clk_work));
>                                lock(&port->mutex);
>      lock((work_completion)(&data->clk_work));
> 
>      *** DEADLOCK ***
> 
> So the CPU performing the UART port shutdown procedure will wait until the
> ref clock change notifier is finished (worker is flushed), while the later
> will wait for a port mutex being released.
> 
> A possible solution to bypass the deadlock is to move the worker flush out
> of the critical section protected by the TTY port mutex. For instance we
> can register and de-register the clock change notifier in the port probe
> and remove methods instead of having them called from the port
> startup/shutdown callbacks. But in order to do that we need to make sure
> that the serial8250_update_uartclk() method is safe to be used while the
> port is shutted down. Alas the current implementation doesn't provide that
> safety. The solution described above is introduced in the framework of
> this patchset. See individual patches for details.
> 
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-serial/f1cd5c75-9cda-6896-a4e2-42c5bfc3f5c3@redhat.com
> 
> Hans, could you test the patchset out on your Cherry Trail (x86)-based
> devices? After that we can merge it in into the kernels 5.8 and 5.9 if
> there is no objections against the fix.

Done, I can confirm that this fixes the lockdep issue for me, so you
can add my:

Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>

To the entire series.

Regards,

Hans