[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200927193900.GA30711@kunai>
Date: Sun, 27 Sep 2020 21:39:00 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
rajmohan.mani@...el.com,
Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@...el.com>,
Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@...el.com>,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Support running driver's probe for a device
powered off
> I think we might be overly complicating things. IMHO the series as is
> with the "i2c_" prefix removed from the flags introduced would be
> reusable as is for any other subsystem that needs it. Of course, for
> now, the handling of the flag would remain implemented only in the I2C
> subsystem.
Just to be clear: you are suggesting to remove "i2c" from the DSD
binding "i2c-allow-low-power-probe". And you are not talking about
moving I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE to struct device_driver? I
recall the latter has been NACKed by gkh so far.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists