linux-kernel - Re: [patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c7a5fd123e3c634ce0bbac9abb4ae32c8c67e0c6.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Sun, 27 Sep 2020 13:22:10 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
        Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@....com>,
        Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
        Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
        Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@...il.com>,
        Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
        Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>,
        Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
        intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
        Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>,
        Pensando Drivers <drivers@...sando.io>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
        Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
        Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
        Martin Habets <mhabets@...arflare.com>,
        Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
        Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>,
        Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
        Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
        Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
        Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
        Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
        brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
        brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com,
        Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@...il.com>,
        Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
        Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
        Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
        Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>,
        Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
        Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@....com>,
        Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
        libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
        Pascal Terjan <pterjan@...gle.com>,
        Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Subject: Re: [patch 00/35] net: in_interrupt() cleanup and fixes

On Sun, 2020-09-27 at 21:48 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Folks,
> 
> in the discussion about preempt count consistency accross kernel configurations:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200914204209.256266093@linutronix.de/
> 
> Linus clearly requested that code in drivers and libraries which changes
> behaviour based on execution context should either be split up so that
> e.g. task context invocations and BH invocations have different interfaces
> or if that's not possible the context information has to be provided by the
> caller which knows in which context it is executing.
> 
> This includes conditional locking, allocation mode (GFP_*) decisions and
> avoidance of code paths which might sleep.

Are these patches intended to be applied to Linus'
tree before v5.9 is released?

This patchset will cause conflicts against -next.

For instance, in patch 34, RT_TRACE has already
been removed in -next.