linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add Nand Flash Controller support for Intel LGM SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:21:01 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     "Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX" 
        <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     cheol.yong.kim@...el.com, qi-ming.wu@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        vigneshr@...com, robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        brendanhiggins@...gle.com, boris.brezillon@...labora.com,
        arnd@...db.de, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        robert.jarzmik@...e.fr, hauke.mehrtens@...el.com,
        christophe.kerello@...com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        andriy.shevchenko@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        piotrs@...ence.com, richard@....at, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 1/2] dt-bindings: mtd: Add Nand Flash Controller
 support for Intel LGM SoC

On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 16:42:31 +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
> From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
> 
> Add YAML file for dt-bindings to support NAND Flash Controller
> on Intel's Lightning Mountain SoC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/mtd/intel,lgm-nand.yaml    | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 99 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mtd/intel,lgm-nand.yaml
> 


Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However,
there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream
maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply.

If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed.