[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <160131601790.1815118.3633273002766662278.b4-ty@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 23:13:20 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, kernel-team@...roid.com,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, sumit.garg@...aro.org,
swboyd@...omium.org, maz@...nel.org, mark.rutland@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] arm_pmu: Use NMI for perf interrupt
On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 12:06:59 +0100, Alexandru Elisei wrote:
> The series changes the arm_pmu driver to use NMIs for the perf interrupt
> when NMIs are available on the platform (currently, only arm64 + GICv3). To
> make it easier to play with the patches, I've pushed a branch at [1]:
>
> $ git clone -b pmu-nmi-v7 git://linux-arm.org/linux-ae
>
> The changes from v6 were minor, but I've still run the same tests on an
> espressobin v7*. These are the results of running perf record -a -- sleep
> 60 (all results show kernel symbols with overhead >= 1%):
>
> [...]
Applied to will (for-next/perf), thanks!
[1/7] arm64: perf: Add missing ISB in armv8pmu_enable_counter()
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/490d7b7c0845
[2/7] arm64: perf: Avoid PMXEV* indirection
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/0fdf1bb75953
[3/7] arm64: perf: Remove PMU locking
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/2a0e2a02e4b7
[4/7] arm64: perf: Defer irq_work to IPI_IRQ_WORK
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/05ab72813340
[5/7] KVM: arm64: pmu: Make overflow handler NMI safe
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/95e92e45a454
[6/7] arm_pmu: Introduce pmu_irq_ops
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/f76b130bdb89
[7/7] arm_pmu: arm64: Use NMIs for PMU
https://git.kernel.org/will/c/d8f6267f7ce5
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
Powered by blists - more mailing lists