linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] drm/stm: dsi: Use dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0f034258-c0b7-4739-ddea-b7abe9589504@st.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 07:36:01 +0000
From:   Yannick FERTRE <yannick.fertre@...com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
        Philippe CORNU <philippe.cornu@...com>,
        Antonio BORNEO <antonio.borneo@...com>,
        Vincent ABRIOU <vincent.abriou@...com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
        "Alexandre TORGUE" <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        "dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
        "linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com" 
        <linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/stm: dsi: Use dev_ based logging



On 9/25/20 2:02 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2020-09-25 at 12:22 +0200, Yannick Fertre wrote:
>> Standardize on the dev_ based logging and drop the include of drm_print.h.
>> Remove useless dsi_color_from_mipi function.
> []
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/stm/dw_mipi_dsi-stm.c
> []
>> -	DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("pll_in %ukHz pll_out %ukHz lane_mbps %uMHz\n",
>> -			 pll_in_khz, pll_out_khz, *lane_mbps);
>> +	dev_dbg(dsi->dev, "pll_in %ukHz pll_out %ukHz lane_mbps %uMHz\n", pll_in_khz, pll_out_khz,
>> +		*lane_mbps);
> 
> The line wrapping change here is pretty pointless and IMO
> makes the code harder to read.

Hi,
ok, I will restore the line wrapping.

Best regards

Yannick