[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ae9e3c71-9532-ad13-2109-a278121cf76e@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:47:23 +0800
From: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: phy: tegra: Use IS_ERR() to check and simplify code
Hi all:
在 2020/9/24 18:37, Felipe Balbi 写道:
> Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> writes:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 10:26:15AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>> Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> Use IS_ERR() and PTR_ERR() instead of PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO() to
>>>> simplify code, avoid redundant judgements.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
>>> Applied for next merge window. Make sure to get this driver out of
>>> drivers/usb/phy and moved into drivers/phy ASAP.
>> Sergei had commented on this patch with valid concerns, see here in case
>> you don't have his reply in your inbox:
>>
>> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-tegra/patch/20200910115607.11392-1-tangbin@cmss.chinamobile.com/#2526208
>>
>> I agree with those concerns. This patch is broken because it will output
>> the wrong error code on failure. I don't fully agree with Sergei's point
>> that this patch isn't worth redoing. I do like the idiomatic error
>> handling better, but I think we shouldn't be breaking the error messages
>> like this.
> Sure thing, dropped for now.
Sorry, it's my fault.
Thanks
Tang Bin
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists