linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pci_iounmap() on !CONFIG_GENERIC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200928093107.GA12010@e121166-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:31:07 +0100
From:   Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        George Cherian <george.cherian@...vell.com>,
        Yang Yingliang <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
        linux-pci <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] Fix pci_iounmap() on !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 09:58:51PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 1:45 PM Lorenzo Pieralisi
> <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote:
> > >
> > > Lorenzo Pieralisi (3):
> > >   sparc32: Remove useless io_32.h __KERNEL__ preprocessor guard
> > >   sparc32: Move ioremap/iounmap declaration before asm-generic/io.h
> > >     include
> > >   asm-generic/io.h: Fix !CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP pci_iounmap()
> > >     implementation
> > >
> > >  arch/sparc/include/asm/io_32.h | 17 ++++++---------
> > >  include/asm-generic/io.h       | 39 +++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > >  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >
> > Arnd, David, Bjorn,
> >
> > I have got review/test tags, is it OK if we merge this series please ?
> >
> > Can we pull it in the PCI tree or you want it to go via a different
> > route upstream ?
> >
> > Please let me know.
> 
> Going through the PCI tree sounds good to me, but I can
> take it through the asm-generic tree if Bjorn doesn't want to
> pick it up there.

Bjorn, can we pull this series into PCI tree please - if that's OK
with you ?

Thanks,
Lorenzo