linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: bdc: Remove duplicate error message in bdc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f1e0051e-30a2-beea-0459-c392d0c4104e@cmss.chinamobile.com>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:31:14 +0800
From:   Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: bdc: Remove duplicate error message in bdc_probe()

Hi

在 2020/9/28 19:23, Greg KH 写道:
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 06:55:26PM +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
>> Hi Balbi：
>>
>> 在 2020/9/28 17:40, Felipe Balbi 写道:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com> writes:
>>>> Hi Greg KH:
>>>>
>>>> 在 2020/9/27 21:45, Greg KH 写道:
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:42:18PM +0800, Tang Bin wrote:
>>>>>> In this function, we don't need dev_err() message because
>>>>>> when something goes wrong, devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
>>>>>> can print an error message itself, so remove the redundant
>>>>>> one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Zhang Shengju <zhangshengju@...s.chinamobile.com>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Tang Bin <tangbin@...s.chinamobile.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>     drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c | 4 +---
>>>>>>     1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c
>>>>>> index 02a3a7746..9454f179e 100644
>>>>>> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c
>>>>>> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/bdc/bdc_core.c
>>>>>> @@ -508,10 +508,8 @@ static int bdc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>>>     	bdc->clk = clk;
>>>>>>     	bdc->regs = devm_platform_ioremap_resource(pdev, 0);
>>>>>> -	if (IS_ERR(bdc->regs)) {
>>>>>> -		dev_err(dev, "ioremap error\n");
>>>>>> +	if (IS_ERR(bdc->regs))
>>>>>>     		return -ENOMEM;
>>>>> Why not return the error given to us?
>>>> Because when get ioremap failed, devm_platform_ioremap_resource() can
>>>> print error message
>>>>
>>>> "dev_err(dev, "ioremap failed for resource %pR\n", res)" in it's called
>>>> function. So I think this's place's
>>>>
>>>> dev_err(dev, "ioremap error\n") is redundant.
>>> that's not what Greg point you at, though. Greg's concern is valid in
>>> that instead of passing along the error within bdc->regs, you always
>>> return -ENOMEM. OTW, your code should read like so:
>>>
>>> 	if (IS_ERR(bdc->regs))
>>>           	return PTR_ERR(bdc->regs);
>> Thanks for your explain，when I send the patch yesterday, my point is at
>> dev_err(), and not aimed at IS_ERR() & PTR_ERR(),
>>
>> if it's Greg's point, I will change this patch after his reply.
> Felipe is correct, and also, you should listen to him over me as he is
> the maintainer of this part of the kernel :)
>
Thanks for your reply, I will send v2 for all of you.


For me, all of you are the teachers, I am glad to learn from you. I 
respect every teacher,

I think Felipe should be able to feel.  Because the premise of the patch,

Felipe is also teaching me the question. So I feel I am lucky.


Thanks for all of you. Thanks

Tang Bin