[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200928113415.GA555@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 13:34:15 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Paul Cercueil <paul@...pouillou.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
DRI <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the drm tree
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 12:15:56PM +0200, Paul Cercueil wrote:
> Hi Christoph,
>
> Le lun. 28 sept. 2020 à 8:04, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> a écrit :
>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:54:05PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> After merging the drm tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
>>> allmodconfig)
>>> failed like this:
>>
>> The driver needs to switch do dma_alloc_noncoherent + dma_sync_single*
>> like the other drivers converted in the dma tree. Paul, let me know if
>> you have any questions.
>
> I don't dma_alloc* anything, DRM core does. I use the
> DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT attr with dma_mmap_attrs(). Is there a replacement
> for that?
dma_mmap_attrs can only be used on allocations from dma_mmap_attrs with
the same attrs. As there is no allocation using DMA_ATTR_NON_CONSISTENT
in the drm core, something looks very fishy here.
Where does the allocation you try to mmap come from? All the allocations
in drivers/gpu/drm/drm_gem_cma_helper.c seems to use dma_alloc_wc (aka
dma_allloc_attrs with the DMA_ATTR_WRITE_COMBINE flag).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists