linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Support running driver's probe for a device powered off

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:17:44 +0200
From:   "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To:     Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>
Cc:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Luca Ceresoli <luca@...aceresoli.net>,
        linux-i2c <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        "Mani, Rajmohan" <rajmohan.mani@...el.com>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
        Chiranjeevi Rapolu <chiranjeevi.rapolu@...el.com>,
        Hyungwoo Yang <hyungwoo.yang@...el.com>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 0/6] Support running driver's probe for a device
 powered off

On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:44 PM Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 9:39 PM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I think we might be overly complicating things. IMHO the series as is
> > > with the "i2c_" prefix removed from the flags introduced would be
> > > reusable as is for any other subsystem that needs it. Of course, for
> > > now, the handling of the flag would remain implemented only in the I2C
> > > subsystem.
> >
> > Just to be clear: you are suggesting to remove "i2c" from the DSD
> > binding "i2c-allow-low-power-probe". And you are not talking about
> > moving I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE to struct device_driver? I
> > recall the latter has been NACKed by gkh so far.
> >
>
> I'd also drop "I2C_" from "I2C_DRV_FL_ALLOW_LOW_POWER_PROBE", but all
> the implementation would remain where it is in the code. IOW, I'm just
> suggesting a naming change to avoid proliferating duplicate flags of
> the same meaning across subsystems.

But that would indicate that the property was recognized by other
subsystems which wouldn't be the case, so it would be confusing.

That's why it cannot be documented as a general property ATM too.