[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200928174505.75fda272@collabora.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:45:05 +0200
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc: Thirumalesha N <nthirumalesha7@...il.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
Shivamurthy Shastri <sshivamurthy@...ron.com>,
Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: spinand: micron: Generalize the function
and structure names
On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 16:55:28 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:
> > IMHO, grouped means, ecc bytes are at continuous address, where as
> > interleaved means ecc bytes splitted into multiple addresses
>
> I don't like the name. Interleaved means that there are OOB bytes
> stored in the data section, which is not the case here.
Well, I would argue that the term interleaved alone doesn't say
anything about the things that are interleaved. But I guess
split/grouped would be fine too if you want to avoid re-using
interleaved here.
> The way OOB
> bytes are organized do not seem relevant to me, I think i prefer the
> "_4_/_8_" naming,even if it's not very explicit.
The ECC strength doesn't say anything about the scheme used for ECC
bytes placement, and you might end up with 2 different schemes
providing the same strength, or the same scheme used for 2 different
strengths.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists