linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: spinand: micron: Generalize the function and structure names

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 18:03:43 +0200
From:   Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
To:     Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
Cc:     Thirumalesha N <nthirumalesha7@...il.com>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
        Shivamurthy Shastri <sshivamurthy@...ron.com>,
        Chuanhong Guo <gch981213@...il.com>,
        linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: spinand: micron: Generalize the function
 and structure names

On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:50:05 +0200
Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com> wrote:

> > > The way OOB
> > > bytes are organized do not seem relevant to me, I think i prefer the
> > > "_4_/_8_" naming,even if it's not very explicit.    
> > 
> > The ECC strength doesn't say anything about the scheme used for ECC
> > bytes placement, and you might end up with 2 different schemes
> > providing the same strength, or the same scheme used for 2 different
> > strengths.  
> 
> So perhaps both should be present in the name?

No, the point was to re-use the same functions for various strengths if
they use the same ECC placement scheme.