[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200929110014.307591977@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:56:50 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 079/388] ipv6_route_seq_next should increase position index
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
[ Upstream commit 4fc427e0515811250647d44de38d87d7b0e0790f ]
if seq_file .next fuction does not change position index,
read after some lseek can generate unexpected output.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
index 96d80e50bf35b..9ca6c32065ec6 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_fib.c
@@ -2479,14 +2479,13 @@ static void *ipv6_route_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
struct net *net = seq_file_net(seq);
struct ipv6_route_iter *iter = seq->private;
+ ++(*pos);
if (!v)
goto iter_table;
n = rcu_dereference_bh(((struct fib6_info *)v)->fib6_next);
- if (n) {
- ++*pos;
+ if (n)
return n;
- }
iter_table:
ipv6_route_check_sernum(iter);
@@ -2494,8 +2493,6 @@ iter_table:
r = fib6_walk_continue(&iter->w);
spin_unlock_bh(&iter->tbl->tb6_lock);
if (r > 0) {
- if (v)
- ++*pos;
return iter->w.leaf;
} else if (r < 0) {
fib6_walker_unlink(net, &iter->w);
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists