[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABCJKuft6NaesrL+840n3ZNjwaWfrc7Z++QFM=e7Ludom_BhLQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 08:39:43 -0700
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] static_call: Fix return type of static_call_init
Hi Nathan,
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 4:09 PM Nathan Chancellor
<natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Functions that are passed to early_initcall should be of type
> initcall_t, which expects a return type of int. This is not currently an
> error but a patch in the Clang LTO series could change that in the
> future.
>
> Fixes: 9183c3f9ed71 ("static_call: Add inline static call infrastructure")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200904044559.GA507165@ubuntu-n2-xlarge-x86/
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20200903203053.3411268-17-samitolvanen@google.com/
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/static_call.h | 6 +++---
> kernel/static_call.c | 5 +++--
> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/static_call.h b/include/linux/static_call.h
> index bfa2ba39be57..695da4c9b338 100644
> --- a/include/linux/static_call.h
> +++ b/include/linux/static_call.h
> @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ extern void arch_static_call_transform(void *site, void *tramp, void *func, bool
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE
>
> -extern void __init static_call_init(void);
> +extern int __init static_call_init(void);
>
> struct static_call_mod {
> struct static_call_mod *next;Thank you for sending the patch, this looks correct to me.
> @@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ extern int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end);
>
> #elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL)
>
> -static inline void static_call_init(void) { }
> +static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>
> struct static_call_key {
> void *func;
> @@ -234,7 +234,7 @@ static inline int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
>
> #else /* Generic implementation */
>
> -static inline void static_call_init(void) { }
> +static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
>
> struct static_call_key {
> void *func;
> diff --git a/kernel/static_call.c b/kernel/static_call.c
> index f8362b3f8fd5..84565c2a41b8 100644
> --- a/kernel/static_call.c
> +++ b/kernel/static_call.c
> @@ -410,12 +410,12 @@ int static_call_text_reserved(void *start, void *end)
> return __static_call_mod_text_reserved(start, end);
> }
>
> -void __init static_call_init(void)
> +int __init static_call_init(void)
> {
> int ret;
>
> if (static_call_initialized)
> - return;
> + return 0;
>
> cpus_read_lock();
> static_call_lock();
> @@ -434,6 +434,7 @@ void __init static_call_init(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_MODULES
> register_module_notifier(&static_call_module_nb);
> #endif
> + return 0;
> }
> early_initcall(static_call_init);
>
>
> base-commit: de394e7568ce2cdb4643ed230169f484f25f9442
> --
> 2.28.0
Thank you for sending the patch, this looks correct to me.
Reviewed-by: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>
Sami
Powered by blists - more mailing lists