[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200929171700.GA14317@willie-the-truck>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:17:01 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][next] perf: arm-cmn: Fix unsigned comparison to less
than zero
On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 12:08:35PM -0500, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Fix unsigned comparison to less than zero by assigning the returned
> value of function platform_get_irq() to a new integer variable _ret_
> and then make the comparison. In case the returned value is greater
> than or equal to zero, assign it to dtc->irq.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1497488 ("Unsigned compared against 0")
> Fixes: 0ba64770a2f2 ("perf: Add Arm CMN-600 PMU driver")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@...nel.org>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> index e824b5b83ea2..383b67042677 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cmn.c
> @@ -1246,11 +1246,13 @@ static int arm_cmn_init_dtc(struct arm_cmn *cmn, struct arm_cmn_node *dn, int id
> {
> struct arm_cmn_dtc *dtc = cmn->dtc + idx;
> struct arm_cmn_node *xp;
> + int ret;
>
> dtc->base = dn->pmu_base - CMN_PMU_OFFSET;
> - dtc->irq = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(cmn->dev), idx);
> - if (dtc->irq < 0)
> - return dtc->irq;
> + ret = platform_get_irq(to_platform_device(cmn->dev), idx);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + dtc->irq = ret;
Why don't we just change the type of the 'irq' field in 'struct arm_cmn_dtc'
to be 'int' instead of 'unsigned int'?
Robin?
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists