linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] dt-binding: display: Require two rests on mantix panel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:46:24 -0500
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
Cc:     Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 3/3] dt-binding: display: Require two rests on
 mantix panel

On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 09:38:07PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Guido.
> 
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 06:55:52PM +0200, Guido Günther wrote:
> > We need to reset both for the panel to show an image.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>
> > ---
> >  .../bindings/display/panel/mantix,mlaf057we51-x.yaml       | 7 +++++--
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/mantix,mlaf057we51-x.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/mantix,mlaf057we51-x.yaml
> > index 937323cc9aaa..ba5a18fac9f9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/mantix,mlaf057we51-x.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/mantix,mlaf057we51-x.yaml
> > @@ -35,7 +35,9 @@ properties:
> >    vddi-supply:
> >      description: 1.8V I/O voltage supply
> >  
> > -  reset-gpios: true
> > +  reset-gpios:
> > +    minItems: 2
> > +    maxItems: 2
> 
> reset-gpios is, as you already wrote, defined in panel-common.yaml.
> Do not try to change it here.
> It would be much better, I think, to introduce a mantix,reset-gpios
> property.

Yes.

You also need to define what each reset entry corresponds to as the 
assertion/deassertion order could be important. You might just do 2 
properties with <pinname>-gpios.

Rob