linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v13 01/15] mtd: spi-nor: core: use EOPNOTSUPP instead of ENOTSUPP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9eabfa53-40a7-3e29-b59f-bf762b2d0af4@microchip.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:30:35 +0000
From:   <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>
To:     <p.yadav@...com>, <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>, <richard@....at>,
        <vigneshr@...com>, <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <nsekhar@...com>, <boris.brezillon@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 01/15] mtd: spi-nor: core: use EOPNOTSUPP instead of
 ENOTSUPP

On 9/16/20 3:44 PM, Pratyush Yadav wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
> 
> ENOTSUPP is not a SUSV4 error code. Using EOPNOTSUPP is preferred
> in its stead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pratyush Yadav <p.yadav@...com>

Reviewed-by: Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com>

> ---
>  drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> index 65eff4ce6ab1..623384ef9a5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/spi-nor/core.c
> @@ -2297,7 +2297,7 @@ static int spi_nor_hwcaps_pp2cmd(u32 hwcaps)
>   *@nor:        pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
>   *@op:         pointer to op template to be checked
>   *
> - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise.
> + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise.
>   */
>  static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
>                                    struct spi_mem_op *op)
> @@ -2311,12 +2311,12 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
>         op->addr.nbytes = 4;
>         if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op)) {
>                 if (nor->mtd.size > SZ_16M)
> -                       return -ENOTSUPP;
> +                       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> 
>                 /* If flash size <= 16MB, 3 address bytes are sufficient */
>                 op->addr.nbytes = 3;
>                 if (!spi_mem_supports_op(nor->spimem, op))
> -                       return -ENOTSUPP;
> +                       return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>         }
> 
>         return 0;
> @@ -2328,7 +2328,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_op(struct spi_nor *nor,
>   *@nor:         pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
>   *@...d:        pointer to op template to be checked
>   *
> - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise.
> + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise.
>   */
>  static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor,
>                                        const struct spi_nor_read_command *read)
> @@ -2354,7 +2354,7 @@ static int spi_nor_spimem_check_readop(struct spi_nor *nor,
>   *@nor:         pointer to a 'struct spi_nor'
>   *@pp:          pointer to op template to be checked
>   *
> - * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -ENOTSUPP otherwise.
> + * Returns 0 if operation is supported, -EOPNOTSUPP otherwise.
>   */
>  static int spi_nor_spimem_check_pp(struct spi_nor *nor,
>                                    const struct spi_nor_pp_command *pp)
> --
> 2.28.0
>