[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200929174654.GA773@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 18:46:54 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
Cc: Nitesh Narayan Lal <nitesh@...hat.com>, hch@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
frederic@...nel.org, mtosatti@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com,
jesse.brandeburg@...el.com, lihong.yang@...el.com,
jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com, jacob.e.keller@...el.com,
jlelli@...hat.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, mike.marciniszyn@...el.com,
dennis.dalessandro@...el.com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
jiri@...dia.com, mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
lgoncalv@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] PCI: Limit pci_alloc_irq_vectors() to
housekeeping CPUs
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 04:59:31PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [to: Christoph in case he has comments, since I think he wrote this code]
I think I actually suggested this a few iterations back.
> > + hk_cpus = housekeeping_num_online_cpus(HK_FLAG_MANAGED_IRQ);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * If we have isolated CPUs for use by real-time tasks, to keep the
> > + * latency overhead to a minimum, device-specific IRQ vectors are moved
> > + * to the housekeeping CPUs from the userspace by changing their
> > + * affinity mask. Limit the vector usage to keep housekeeping CPUs from
> > + * running out of IRQ vectors.
> > + */
> > + if (hk_cpus < num_online_cpus()) {
I woukd have moved the assignment to hk_cpus below the comment and
just above the if, but that is really just a minor style preference.
Otherwise this looks good:
Acked-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists