[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200929105937.404309998@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:59:16 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 044/166] rt_cpu_seq_next should increase position index
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
[ Upstream commit a3ea86739f1bc7e121d921842f0f4a8ab1af94d9 ]
if seq_file .next fuction does not change position index,
read after some lseek can generate unexpected output.
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=206283
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@...tuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
net/ipv4/route.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv4/route.c b/net/ipv4/route.c
index ed835ca068798..6fcb12e083d99 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/route.c
@@ -276,6 +276,7 @@ static void *rt_cpu_seq_next(struct seq_file *seq, void *v, loff_t *pos)
*pos = cpu+1;
return &per_cpu(rt_cache_stat, cpu);
}
+ (*pos)++;
return NULL;
}
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists