linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufshcd: Properly set the device Icc Level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0edf03ca16e2ee6e4ed8e5ac72752a94@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Mon, 28 Sep 2020 19:35:52 -0700
From:   nguyenb@...eaurora.org
To:     cang@...eaurora.org, asutoshd@...eaurora.org,
        martin.petersen@...cle.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>,
        "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] scsi: ufshcd: Properly set the device Icc Level

On 2020-08-31 18:19, Bao D. Nguyen wrote:
> UFS version 3.0 and later devices require Vcc and Vccq power supplies
> with Vccq2 being optional. While earlier UFS version 2.0 and 2.1
> devices, the Vcc and Vccq2 are required with Vccq being optional.
> Check the required power supplies used by the device
> and set the device's supported Icc level properly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bao D. Nguyen <nguyenb@...eaurora.org>
> ---
>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index 06e2439..fdd1d3e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -6845,8 +6845,9 @@ static u32
> ufshcd_find_max_sup_active_icc_level(struct ufs_hba *hba,
>  {
>  	u32 icc_level = 0;
> 
> -	if (!hba->vreg_info.vcc || !hba->vreg_info.vccq ||
> -						!hba->vreg_info.vccq2) {
> +	if (!hba->vreg_info.vcc ||
> +		(!hba->vreg_info.vccq && hba->dev_info.wspecversion >= 0x300) ||
> +		(!hba->vreg_info.vccq2 && hba->dev_info.wspecversion < 0x300)) {
>  		dev_err(hba->dev,
>  			"%s: Regulator capability was not set, actvIccLevel=%d",
>  							__func__, icc_level);

Hello,
Thank you for the comments on this change so far.
It's been idle for some time, so I would like to ping and see if there 
is any other comment.

Regards,
Bao