linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.19 110/245] tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:59:21 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 110/245] tpm: ibmvtpm: Wait for buffer to be set before proceeding

From: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit d8d74ea3c00214aee1e1826ca18e77944812b9b4 ]

Synchronize with the results from the CRQs before continuing with
the initialization. This avoids trying to send TPM commands while
the rtce buffer has not been allocated, yet.

This patch fixes an existing race condition that may occurr if the
hypervisor does not quickly respond to the VTPM_GET_RTCE_BUFFER_SIZE
request sent during initialization and therefore the ibmvtpm->rtce_buf
has not been allocated at the time the first TPM command is sent.

Fixes: 132f76294744 ("drivers/char/tpm: Add new device driver to support IBM vTPM")
Signed-off-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Nayna Jain <nayna@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c | 9 +++++++++
 drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h | 1 +
 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
index 569e93e1f06cc..3ba67bc6baba0 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.c
@@ -588,6 +588,7 @@ static irqreturn_t ibmvtpm_interrupt(int irq, void *vtpm_instance)
 	 */
 	while ((crq = ibmvtpm_crq_get_next(ibmvtpm)) != NULL) {
 		ibmvtpm_crq_process(crq, ibmvtpm);
+		wake_up_interruptible(&ibmvtpm->crq_queue.wq);
 		crq->valid = 0;
 		smp_wmb();
 	}
@@ -635,6 +636,7 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
 	}
 
 	crq_q->num_entry = CRQ_RES_BUF_SIZE / sizeof(*crq_q->crq_addr);
+	init_waitqueue_head(&crq_q->wq);
 	ibmvtpm->crq_dma_handle = dma_map_single(dev, crq_q->crq_addr,
 						 CRQ_RES_BUF_SIZE,
 						 DMA_BIDIRECTIONAL);
@@ -687,6 +689,13 @@ static int tpm_ibmvtpm_probe(struct vio_dev *vio_dev,
 	if (rc)
 		goto init_irq_cleanup;
 
+	if (!wait_event_timeout(ibmvtpm->crq_queue.wq,
+				ibmvtpm->rtce_buf != NULL,
+				HZ)) {
+		dev_err(dev, "CRQ response timed out\n");
+		goto init_irq_cleanup;
+	}
+
 	return tpm_chip_register(chip);
 init_irq_cleanup:
 	do {
diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
index 91dfe766d0800..4f6a124601db4 100644
--- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
+++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_ibmvtpm.h
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct ibmvtpm_crq_queue {
 	struct ibmvtpm_crq *crq_addr;
 	u32 index;
 	u32 num_entry;
+	wait_queue_head_t wq;
 };
 
 struct ibmvtpm_dev {
-- 
2.25.1