[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200929105930.647315776@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:59:13 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>,
Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 009/121] bnxt_en: Protect bnxt_set_eee() and bnxt_set_pauseparam() with mutex.
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
[ Upstream commit a53906908148d64423398a62c4435efb0d09652c ]
All changes related to bp->link_info require the protection of the
link_lock mutex. It's not sufficient to rely just on RTNL.
Fixes: 163e9ef63641 ("bnxt_en: Fix race when modifying pause settings.")
Reviewed-by: Edwin Peer <edwin.peer@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@...adcom.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c | 31 ++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt_ethtool.c
@@ -1000,9 +1000,12 @@ static int bnxt_set_pauseparam(struct ne
if (!BNXT_SINGLE_PF(bp))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ mutex_lock(&bp->link_lock);
if (epause->autoneg) {
- if (!(link_info->autoneg & BNXT_AUTONEG_SPEED))
- return -EINVAL;
+ if (!(link_info->autoneg & BNXT_AUTONEG_SPEED)) {
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto pause_exit;
+ }
link_info->autoneg |= BNXT_AUTONEG_FLOW_CTRL;
if (bp->hwrm_spec_code >= 0x10201)
@@ -1023,11 +1026,11 @@ static int bnxt_set_pauseparam(struct ne
if (epause->tx_pause)
link_info->req_flow_ctrl |= BNXT_LINK_PAUSE_TX;
- if (netif_running(dev)) {
- mutex_lock(&bp->link_lock);
+ if (netif_running(dev))
rc = bnxt_hwrm_set_pause(bp);
- mutex_unlock(&bp->link_lock);
- }
+
+pause_exit:
+ mutex_unlock(&bp->link_lock);
return rc;
}
@@ -1671,8 +1674,7 @@ static int bnxt_set_eee(struct net_devic
struct bnxt *bp = netdev_priv(dev);
struct ethtool_eee *eee = &bp->eee;
struct bnxt_link_info *link_info = &bp->link_info;
- u32 advertising =
- _bnxt_fw_to_ethtool_adv_spds(link_info->advertising, 0);
+ u32 advertising;
int rc = 0;
if (!BNXT_SINGLE_PF(bp))
@@ -1681,19 +1683,23 @@ static int bnxt_set_eee(struct net_devic
if (!(bp->flags & BNXT_FLAG_EEE_CAP))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ mutex_lock(&bp->link_lock);
+ advertising = _bnxt_fw_to_ethtool_adv_spds(link_info->advertising, 0);
if (!edata->eee_enabled)
goto eee_ok;
if (!(link_info->autoneg & BNXT_AUTONEG_SPEED)) {
netdev_warn(dev, "EEE requires autoneg\n");
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto eee_exit;
}
if (edata->tx_lpi_enabled) {
if (bp->lpi_tmr_hi && (edata->tx_lpi_timer > bp->lpi_tmr_hi ||
edata->tx_lpi_timer < bp->lpi_tmr_lo)) {
netdev_warn(dev, "Valid LPI timer range is %d and %d microsecs\n",
bp->lpi_tmr_lo, bp->lpi_tmr_hi);
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto eee_exit;
} else if (!bp->lpi_tmr_hi) {
edata->tx_lpi_timer = eee->tx_lpi_timer;
}
@@ -1703,7 +1709,8 @@ static int bnxt_set_eee(struct net_devic
} else if (edata->advertised & ~advertising) {
netdev_warn(dev, "EEE advertised %x must be a subset of autoneg advertised speeds %x\n",
edata->advertised, advertising);
- return -EINVAL;
+ rc = -EINVAL;
+ goto eee_exit;
}
eee->advertised = edata->advertised;
@@ -1715,6 +1722,8 @@ eee_ok:
if (netif_running(dev))
rc = bnxt_hwrm_set_link_setting(bp, false, true);
+eee_exit:
+ mutex_unlock(&bp->link_lock);
return rc;
}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists