linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 093/388] btrfs: tree-checker: Check leaf chunk item size

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:57:04 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 093/388] btrfs: tree-checker: Check leaf chunk item size

From: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>

[ Upstream commit f6d2a5c263afca84646cf3300dc13061bedbd99e ]

Inspired by btrfs-progs github issue #208, where chunk item in chunk
tree has invalid num_stripes (0).

Although that can already be caught by current btrfs_check_chunk_valid(),
that function doesn't really check item size as it needs to handle chunk
item in super block sys_chunk_array().

This patch will add two extra checks for chunk items in chunk tree:

- Basic chunk item size
  If the item is smaller than btrfs_chunk (which already contains one
  stripe), exit right now as reading num_stripes may even go beyond
  eb boundary.

- Item size check against num_stripes
  If item size doesn't match with calculated chunk size, then either the
  item size or the num_stripes is corrupted. Error out anyway.

Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 91ea38506fbb7..84b8d6ebf98f3 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -674,6 +674,44 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 	return 0;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Enhanced version of chunk item checker.
+ *
+ * The common btrfs_check_chunk_valid() doesn't check item size since it needs
+ * to work on super block sys_chunk_array which doesn't have full item ptr.
+ */
+static int check_leaf_chunk_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
+				 struct btrfs_chunk *chunk,
+				 struct btrfs_key *key, int slot)
+{
+	int num_stripes;
+
+	if (btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot) < sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk)) {
+		chunk_err(leaf, chunk, key->offset,
+			"invalid chunk item size: have %u expect [%zu, %u)",
+			btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot),
+			sizeof(struct btrfs_chunk),
+			BTRFS_LEAF_DATA_SIZE(leaf->fs_info));
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
+	num_stripes = btrfs_chunk_num_stripes(leaf, chunk);
+	/* Let btrfs_check_chunk_valid() handle this error type */
+	if (num_stripes == 0)
+		goto out;
+
+	if (btrfs_chunk_item_size(num_stripes) !=
+	    btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot)) {
+		chunk_err(leaf, chunk, key->offset,
+			"invalid chunk item size: have %u expect %lu",
+			btrfs_item_size_nr(leaf, slot),
+			btrfs_chunk_item_size(num_stripes));
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+out:
+	return btrfs_check_chunk_valid(leaf, chunk, key->offset);
+}
+
 __printf(3, 4)
 __cold
 static void dev_item_err(const struct extent_buffer *eb, int slot,
@@ -1265,7 +1303,7 @@ static int check_leaf_item(struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_CHUNK_ITEM_KEY:
 		chunk = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, slot, struct btrfs_chunk);
-		ret = btrfs_check_chunk_valid(leaf, chunk, key->offset);
+		ret = check_leaf_chunk_item(leaf, chunk, key, slot);
 		break;
 	case BTRFS_DEV_ITEM_KEY:
 		ret = check_dev_item(leaf, key, slot);
-- 
2.25.1