lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200929110027.746939753@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:01:28 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>, Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 357/388] bpf: Fix a rcu warning for bpffs map pretty-print

From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>

[ Upstream commit ce880cb825fcc22d4e39046a6c3a3a7f6603883d ]

Running selftest
  ./btf_btf -p
the kernel had the following warning:
  [   51.528185] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1756 at kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:717 htab_map_get_next_key+0x2eb/0x300
  [   51.529217] Modules linked in:
  [   51.529583] CPU: 3 PID: 1756 Comm: test_btf Not tainted 5.9.0-rc1+ #878
  [   51.530346] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.3-1.el7.centos 04/01/2014
  [   51.531410] RIP: 0010:htab_map_get_next_key+0x2eb/0x300
  ...
  [   51.542826] Call Trace:
  [   51.543119]  map_seq_next+0x53/0x80
  [   51.543528]  seq_read+0x263/0x400
  [   51.543932]  vfs_read+0xad/0x1c0
  [   51.544311]  ksys_read+0x5f/0xe0
  [   51.544689]  do_syscall_64+0x33/0x40
  [   51.545116]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9

The related source code in kernel/bpf/hashtab.c:
  709 static int htab_map_get_next_key(struct bpf_map *map, void *key, void *next_key)
  710 {
  711         struct bpf_htab *htab = container_of(map, struct bpf_htab, map);
  712         struct hlist_nulls_head *head;
  713         struct htab_elem *l, *next_l;
  714         u32 hash, key_size;
  715         int i = 0;
  716
  717         WARN_ON_ONCE(!rcu_read_lock_held());

In kernel/bpf/inode.c, bpffs map pretty print calls map->ops->map_get_next_key()
without holding a rcu_read_lock(), hence causing the above warning.
To fix the issue, just surrounding map->ops->map_get_next_key() with rcu read lock.

Fixes: a26ca7c982cb ("bpf: btf: Add pretty print support to the basic arraymap")
Reported-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>
Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200916004401.146277-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/inode.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/inode.c b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
index 218c09ff6a273..375d93eb71c71 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/inode.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/inode.c
@@ -205,10 +205,12 @@ static void *map_seq_next(struct seq_file *m, void *v, loff_t *pos)
 	else
 		prev_key = key;
 
+	rcu_read_lock();
 	if (map->ops->map_get_next_key(map, prev_key, key)) {
 		map_iter(m)->done = true;
-		return NULL;
+		key = NULL;
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return key;
 }
 
-- 
2.25.1



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ