linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] selftests/vm: use a common gup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <715c49ec-d2a8-45cb-8ace-c6b1b4b8f978@nvidia.com>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:59:55 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] selftests/vm: use a common gup_test.h

On 9/29/20 10:55 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:44:31AM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>> On 9/29/20 9:35 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:10:24PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
>>>> On 9/28/20 5:57 AM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 11:21:53PM -0700, John Hubbard wrote:
...
>> I don't see any "gcc -m" type of dependency generation pass happening
>> in this relatively simple Make system.
> 
> It happens with -MD, all the deps are stored in files like mm/.init-mm.o.cmd
> and sucked into the build.

You are thinking of kbuild. This is not kbuild. There are no such artifacts
being generated.

>> And so, without including an explicit header file dependency (at
>> least, that's the simplest way), changes to gup_test.h are not
>> detected.
> 
> Shouldn't be
> 
>> Both the Makefile code and the observed behavior back this up. (I
>> expect that this is because there is less use of header files in
>> this area, because most unit tests are self-contained within a
>> single .c file.)
> 
> Something else is very wrong then.
> 

Not really, it's just a less-cabable system than kbuild.

thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA