[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <554699c6-cc01-4c3c-3ed5-26d22ac3bac0@nvidia.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:11:34 -0700
From: John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To: Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] selftests/vm: use a common gup_test.h
On 9/29/20 1:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/29/20 1:53 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> I only remarked because I didn't know it wasn't using kbuild. I
>> thought it would have used the existing HOSTCC stuff, not sure why it
>> is special.
>>
>> The only investment that seems worthwhile would be to switch it to use
>> the normal kbuild stuff??
>>
>
> I explored switching to kbuild at the kernel summit last year during
> my kselftest where are we talk.
>
> There was push back from several developers. We can definitely explore
> it as long as we can still support being able to build and run
> individual subsystem tests and doesn't break workflow for developers.
>
Do you have a link or two for that? Especially about the pushback, and
conclusions reached, if any.
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
Powered by blists - more mailing lists