linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/8] selftests/vm: use a common gup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:11:34 -0700
From:   John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
CC:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
        Ralph Campbell <rcampbell@...dia.com>,
        Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] selftests/vm: use a common gup_test.h

On 9/29/20 1:00 PM, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/29/20 1:53 PM, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
>> I only remarked because I didn't know it wasn't using kbuild. I
>> thought it would have used the existing HOSTCC stuff, not sure why it
>> is special.
>>
>> The only investment that seems worthwhile would be to switch it to use
>> the normal kbuild stuff??
>>
> 
> I explored switching to kbuild at the kernel summit last year during
> my kselftest where are we talk.
> 
> There was push back from several developers. We can definitely explore
> it as long as we can still support being able to build and run
> individual subsystem tests and doesn't break workflow for developers.
> 

Do you have a link or two for that? Especially about the pushback, and
conclusions reached, if any.



thanks,
-- 
John Hubbard
NVIDIA