[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200929203500.277654701@linutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 22:25:17 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Christian Benvenuti <benve@...co.com>,
Govindarajulu Varadarajan <_govind@....com>,
Dave Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Luc Van Oostenryck <luc.vanoostenryck@...il.com>,
Jay Cliburn <jcliburn@...il.com>,
Chris Snook <chris.snook@...il.com>,
Vishal Kulkarni <vishal@...lsio.com>,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org,
Shannon Nelson <snelson@...sando.io>,
Pensando Drivers <drivers@...sando.io>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
Solarflare linux maintainers <linux-net-drivers@...arflare.com>,
Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
Martin Habets <mhabets@...arflare.com>,
Jon Mason <jdmason@...zu.us>, Daniel Drake <dsd@...too.org>,
Ulrich Kunitz <kune@...ne-taler.de>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Arend van Spriel <arend.vanspriel@...adcom.com>,
Franky Lin <franky.lin@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <hante.meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Chi-Hsien Lin <chi-hsien.lin@...ress.com>,
Wright Feng <wright.feng@...ress.com>,
brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@...adcom.com,
brcm80211-dev-list@...ress.com,
Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@...il.com>,
Stanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@...pl>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>,
Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@...el.com>,
Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@...el.com>,
Jouni Malinen <j@...fi>,
Amitkumar Karwar <amitkarwar@...il.com>,
Ganapathi Bhat <ganapathi.bhat@....com>,
Xinming Hu <huxinming820@...il.com>,
libertas-dev@...ts.infradead.org,
Pascal Terjan <pterjan@...gle.com>,
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@...ltek.com>
Subject: [patch V2 08/36] net: e100: Remove in_interrupt() usage and pointless
GFP_ATOMIC allocation
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
e100_hw_init() invokes e100_self_test() only if in_interrupt() returns
false as e100_self_test() uses msleep() which requires sleepable task
context. The in_interrupt() check is incomplete because in_interrupt()
cannot catch callers from contexts which have just preemption or interrupts
disabled.
e100_hw_init() is invoked from:
- e100_loopback_test() which clearly is sleepable task context as the
function uses msleep() itself.
- e100_up() which clearly is sleepable task context as well because it
invokes e100_alloc_cbs() abd request_irq() which both require sleepable
task context due to GFP_KERNEL allocations and mutex_lock() operations.
Remove the pointless in_interrupt() check.
As a side effect of this analysis it turned out that e100_rx_alloc_list()
which is only invoked from e100_loopback_test() and e100_up() pointlessly
uses a GFP_ATOMIC allocation. The next invoked function e100_alloc_cbs() is
using GFP_KERNEL already.
Change the allocation mode in e100_rx_alloc_list() to GFP_KERNEL as well.
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e100.c
@@ -1531,7 +1531,7 @@ static int e100_hw_init(struct nic *nic)
e100_hw_reset(nic);
netif_err(nic, hw, nic->netdev, "e100_hw_init\n");
- if (!in_interrupt() && (err = e100_self_test(nic)))
+ if ((err = e100_self_test(nic)))
return err;
if ((err = e100_phy_init(nic)))
@@ -2155,7 +2155,7 @@ static int e100_rx_alloc_list(struct nic
nic->rx_to_use = nic->rx_to_clean = NULL;
nic->ru_running = RU_UNINITIALIZED;
- if (!(nic->rxs = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct rx), GFP_ATOMIC)))
+ if (!(nic->rxs = kcalloc(count, sizeof(struct rx), GFP_KERNEL)))
return -ENOMEM;
for (rx = nic->rxs, i = 0; i < count; rx++, i++) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists