[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <10b5d933-f104-7699-341a-0afb16640d54@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 16:03:36 -0700
From: "Dey, Megha" <megha.dey@...el.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-hyperv@...r.kernel.org,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
Jon Derrick <jonathan.derrick@...el.com>,
Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@...rosoft.com>,
Steve Wahl <steve.wahl@....com>,
Dimitri Sivanich <sivanich@....com>,
Russ Anderson <rja@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>,
Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, dave.jiang@...el.com,
ravi.v.shankar@...el.com
Subject: Re: [patch V2 00/46] x86, PCI, XEN, genirq ...: Prepare for device
MSI
Hi Thomas,
On 8/26/2020 4:16 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> This is the second version of providing a base to support device MSI (non
> PCI based) and on top of that support for IMS (Interrupt Message Storm)
> based devices in a halfways architecture independent way.
>
> The first version can be found here:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200821002424.119492231@linutronix.de
>
> It's still a mixed bag of bug fixes, cleanups and general improvements
> which are worthwhile independent of device MSI.
>
> There are quite a bunch of issues to solve:
>
> - X86 does not use the device::msi_domain pointer for historical reasons
> and due to XEN, which makes it impossible to create an architecture
> agnostic device MSI infrastructure.
>
> - X86 has it's own msi_alloc_info data type which is pointlessly
> different from the generic version and does not allow to share code.
>
> - The logic of composing MSI messages in an hierarchy is busted at the
> core level and of course some (x86) drivers depend on that.
>
> - A few minor shortcomings as usual
>
> This series addresses that in several steps:
>
> 1) Accidental bug fixes
>
> iommu/amd: Prevent NULL pointer dereference
>
> 2) Janitoring
>
> x86/init: Remove unused init ops
> PCI: vmd: Dont abuse vector irqomain as parent
> x86/msi: Remove pointless vcpu_affinity callback
>
> 3) Sanitizing the composition of MSI messages in a hierarchy
>
> genirq/chip: Use the first chip in irq_chip_compose_msi_msg()
> x86/msi: Move compose message callback where it belongs
>
> 4) Simplification of the x86 specific interrupt allocation mechanism
>
> x86/irq: Rename X86_IRQ_ALLOC_TYPE_MSI* to reflect PCI dependency
> x86/irq: Add allocation type for parent domain retrieval
> iommu/vt-d: Consolidate irq domain getter
> iommu/amd: Consolidate irq domain getter
> iommu/irq_remapping: Consolidate irq domain lookup
>
> 5) Consolidation of the X86 specific interrupt allocation mechanism to be as close
> as possible to the generic MSI allocation mechanism which allows to get rid
> of quite a bunch of x86'isms which are pointless
>
> x86/irq: Prepare consolidation of irq_alloc_info
> x86/msi: Consolidate HPET allocation
> x86/ioapic: Consolidate IOAPIC allocation
> x86/irq: Consolidate DMAR irq allocation
> x86/irq: Consolidate UV domain allocation
> PCI/MSI: Rework pci_msi_domain_calc_hwirq()
> x86/msi: Consolidate MSI allocation
> x86/msi: Use generic MSI domain ops
>
> 6) x86 specific cleanups to remove the dependency on arch_*_msi_irqs()
>
> x86/irq: Move apic_post_init() invocation to one place
> x86/pci: Reducde #ifdeffery in PCI init code
> x86/irq: Initialize PCI/MSI domain at PCI init time
> irqdomain/msi: Provide DOMAIN_BUS_VMD_MSI
> PCI: vmd: Mark VMD irqdomain with DOMAIN_BUS_VMD_MSI
> PCI/MSI: Provide pci_dev_has_special_msi_domain() helper
> x86/xen: Make xen_msi_init() static and rename it to xen_hvm_msi_init()
> x86/xen: Rework MSI teardown
> x86/xen: Consolidate XEN-MSI init
> irqdomain/msi: Allow to override msi_domain_alloc/free_irqs()
> x86/xen: Wrap XEN MSI management into irqdomain
> iommm/vt-d: Store irq domain in struct device
> iommm/amd: Store irq domain in struct device
> x86/pci: Set default irq domain in pcibios_add_device()
> PCI/MSI: Make arch_.*_msi_irq[s] fallbacks selectable
> x86/irq: Cleanup the arch_*_msi_irqs() leftovers
> x86/irq: Make most MSI ops XEN private
> iommu/vt-d: Remove domain search for PCI/MSI[X]
> iommu/amd: Remove domain search for PCI/MSI
>
> 7) X86 specific preparation for device MSI
>
> x86/irq: Add DEV_MSI allocation type
> x86/msi: Rename and rework pci_msi_prepare() to cover non-PCI MSI
>
> 8) Generic device MSI infrastructure
> platform-msi: Provide default irq_chip:: Ack
> genirq/proc: Take buslock on affinity write
> genirq/msi: Provide and use msi_domain_set_default_info_flags()
> platform-msi: Add device MSI infrastructure
> irqdomain/msi: Provide msi_alloc/free_store() callbacks
>
> 9) POC of IMS (Interrupt Message Storm) irq domain and irqchip
> implementations for both device array and queue storage.
>
> irqchip: Add IMS (Interrupt Message Storm) driver - NOT FOR MERGING
>
> Changes vs. V1:
>
> - Addressed various review comments and addressed the 0day fallout.
> - Corrected the XEN logic (Jürgen)
> - Make the arch fallback in PCI/MSI opt-in not opt-out (Bjorn)
>
> - Fixed the compose MSI message inconsistency
>
> - Ensure that the necessary flags are set for device SMI
>
> - Make the irq bus logic work for affinity setting to prepare
> support for IMS storage in queue memory. It turned out to be
> less scary than I feared.
>
> - Remove leftovers in iommu/intel|amd
>
> - Reworked the IMS POC driver to cover queue storage so Jason can have a
> look whether that fits the needs of MLX devices.
>
> The whole lot is also available from git:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tglx/devel.git device-msi
>
> This has been tested on Intel/AMD/KVM but lacks testing on:
>
> - HYPERV (-ENODEV)
> - VMD enabled systems (-ENODEV)
> - XEN (-ENOCLUE)
> - IMS (-ENODEV)
>
> - Any non-X86 code which might depend on the broken compose MSI message
> logic. Marc excpects not much fallout, but agrees that we need to fix
> it anyway.
>
> #1 - #3 should be applied unconditionally for obvious reasons
> #4 - #6 are wortwhile cleanups which should be done independent of device MSI
>
> #7 - #8 look promising to cleanup the platform MSI implementation
> independent of #8, but I neither had cycles nor the stomach to
> tackle that.
>
> #9 is obviously just for the folks interested in IMS
>
> Thanks,
>
> tglx
I see that the tip tree (as of 9/29) has most of these patches but
notice that the DEV_MSI related patches
haven't made it. I have tested the tip tree(x86/irq branch) with your
DEV_MSI infra patches and our IMS
patches with the IDXD driver and was wondering if we should push out
those patches as part of our patchset?
Thanks,
Megha
Powered by blists - more mailing lists