linux-kernel - [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Reduce minimal imbalance threshold

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <160136620949.7002.18026460832388099077.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 07:56:49 -0000
From:   "tip-bot2 for Vincent Guittot" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To:     linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        "Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>,
        x86 <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [tip: sched/core] sched/fair: Reduce minimal imbalance threshold

The following commit has been merged into the sched/core branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     2208cdaa56c957e20d8e16f28819aeb47851cb1e
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/2208cdaa56c957e20d8e16f28819aeb47851cb1e
Author:        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
AuthorDate:    Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:24:22 +02:00
Committer:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CommitterDate: Fri, 25 Sep 2020 14:23:26 +02:00

sched/fair: Reduce minimal imbalance threshold

The 25% default imbalance threshold for DIE and NUMA domain is large
enough to generate significant unfairness between threads. A typical
example is the case of 11 threads running on 2x4 CPUs. The imbalance of
20% between the 2 groups of 4 cores is just low enough to not trigger
the load balance between the 2 groups. We will have always the same 6
threads on one group of 4 CPUs and the other 5 threads on the other
group of CPUS. With a fair time sharing in each group, we ends up with
+20% running time for the group of 5 threads.

Consider decreasing the imbalance threshold for overloaded case where we
use the load to balance task and to ensure fair time sharing.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200921072424.14813-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org
---
 kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 249bec7..41df628 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
 		.min_interval		= sd_weight,
 		.max_interval		= 2*sd_weight,
 		.busy_factor		= 32,
-		.imbalance_pct		= 125,
+		.imbalance_pct		= 117,
 
 		.cache_nice_tries	= 0,