linux-kernel - [PATCH] rcu,ftrace: Fix ftrace recursion

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200929113340.GN2628@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 13:33:40 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, kim.phillips@....com
Subject: [PATCH] rcu,ftrace: Fix ftrace recursion


Kim reported that perf-ftrace made his box unhappy. It turns out that
commit:

  ff5c4f5cad33 ("rcu/tree: Mark the idle relevant functions noinstr")

removed one too many notrace. Probably due to there not being a helpful
comment.

Reinstate the notrace and add a comment to avoid loosing it again.

Fixes: ff5c4f5cad33 ("rcu/tree: Mark the idle relevant functions noinstr")
Reported-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 5 ++++-
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index ee5e595501e8..33020d84ec6b 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1098,8 +1098,11 @@ noinstr bool __rcu_is_watching(void)
  * CPU can safely enter RCU read-side critical sections.  In other words,
  * if the current CPU is not in its idle loop or is in an interrupt or
  * NMI handler, return true.
+ *
+ * Must be notrace because __ftrace_ops_list_func() / ftrace_ops_assist_func()
+ * will call this (for every function) outside of recursion protection.
  */
-bool rcu_is_watching(void)
+notrace bool rcu_is_watching(void)
 {
 	bool ret;