linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 064/388] s390: avoid misusing CALL_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200929110013.595760729@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 29 Sep 2020 12:56:35 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 064/388] s390: avoid misusing CALL_ON_STACK for task stack setup

From: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit 7bcaad1f9fac889f5fcd1a383acf7e00d006da41 ]

CALL_ON_STACK is intended to be used for temporary stack switching with
potential return to the caller.

When CALL_ON_STACK is misused to switch from nodat stack to task stack
back_chain information would later lead stack unwinder from task stack into
(per cpu) nodat stack which is reused for other purposes. This would
yield confusing unwinding result or errors.

To avoid that introduce CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN to be used instead. It
makes sure that back_chain is zeroed and unwinder finishes gracefully
ending up at task pt_regs.

Reviewed-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h | 11 +++++++++++
 arch/s390/kernel/setup.c           |  9 +--------
 arch/s390/kernel/smp.c             |  2 +-
 3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
index 0ae4bbf7779c8..3679d224fd3c5 100644
--- a/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
+++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/stacktrace.h
@@ -111,4 +111,15 @@ struct stack_frame {
 	r2;								\
 })
 
+#define CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN(fn, stack)				\
+({									\
+	asm volatile(							\
+		"	la	15,0(%[_stack])\n"			\
+		"	xc	%[_bc](8,15),%[_bc](15)\n"		\
+		"	brasl	14,%[_fn]\n"				\
+		::[_bc] "i" (offsetof(struct stack_frame, back_chain)),	\
+		  [_stack] "a" (stack), [_fn] "X" (fn));		\
+	BUG();								\
+})
+
 #endif /* _ASM_S390_STACKTRACE_H */
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
index 07b2b61a0289f..82ef081e7448e 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/setup.c
@@ -356,7 +356,6 @@ early_initcall(async_stack_realloc);
 
 void __init arch_call_rest_init(void)
 {
-	struct stack_frame *frame;
 	unsigned long stack;
 
 	stack = stack_alloc();
@@ -369,13 +368,7 @@ void __init arch_call_rest_init(void)
 	set_task_stack_end_magic(current);
 	stack += STACK_INIT_OFFSET;
 	S390_lowcore.kernel_stack = stack;
-	frame = (struct stack_frame *) stack;
-	memset(frame, 0, sizeof(*frame));
-	/* Branch to rest_init on the new stack, never returns */
-	asm volatile(
-		"	la	15,0(%[_frame])\n"
-		"	jg	rest_init\n"
-		: : [_frame] "a" (frame));
+	CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN(rest_init, stack);
 }
 
 static void __init setup_lowcore_dat_off(void)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
index 66bf050d785cf..ad426cc656e56 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/smp.c
@@ -878,7 +878,7 @@ static void __no_sanitize_address smp_start_secondary(void *cpuvoid)
 	S390_lowcore.restart_source = -1UL;
 	__ctl_load(S390_lowcore.cregs_save_area, 0, 15);
 	__load_psw_mask(PSW_KERNEL_BITS | PSW_MASK_DAT);
-	CALL_ON_STACK(smp_init_secondary, S390_lowcore.kernel_stack, 0);
+	CALL_ON_STACK_NORETURN(smp_init_secondary, S390_lowcore.kernel_stack);
 }
 
 /* Upping and downing of CPUs */
-- 
2.25.1