[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJfpeguFZwkZh0wkPjOLpXODdp_9jELKUrwBgEhDVF4+T8FgTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 17:33:30 +0200
From: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
To: Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com>
Cc: Akilesh Kailash <akailash@...gle.com>,
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@...il.com>,
Antonio SJ Musumeci <trapexit@...wn.link>,
David Anderson <dvander@...gle.com>,
Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@...hat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Martijn Coenen <maco@...roid.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Lawrence <paullawrence@...gle.com>,
Stefano Duo <stefanoduo@...gle.com>,
Zimuzo Ezeozue <zezeozue@...gle.com>,
fuse-devel <fuse-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
kernel-team <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V9 0/4] fuse: Add support for passthrough read/write
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 3:13 PM Alessio Balsini <balsini@...roid.com> wrote:
> The first benchmarks were done by running FIO (fio-3.21) with:
> - bs=4Ki;
> - file size: 50Gi;
> - ioengine: sync;
> - fsync_on_close: true.
> The target file has been chosen large enough to avoid it to be entirely
> loaded into the page cache.
> Results are presented in the following table:
>
> +-----------+--------+-------------+--------+
> | Bandwidth | FUSE | FUSE | Bind |
> | (KiB/s) | | passthrough | mount |
> +-----------+--------+-------------+--------+
> | read | 468897 | 502085 | 516830 |
> +-----------+--------+-------------+--------+
> | randread | 15773 | 26632 | 21386 |
Have you looked into why passthrough is faster than native?
Thanks,
Miklos
Powered by blists - more mailing lists