linux-kernel - Re: linux tooling mailing list

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 30 Sep 2020 10:25:40 -0700
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Cc:     Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
        Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com>,
        Fāng-ruì Sòng <maskray@...gle.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Segher Boessenkool <segher@...nel.crashing.org>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, postmaster@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux tooling mailing list

Does anyone know who's behind postmaster@...r.kernel.org?  Maybe I can
email them directly if perhaps they don't check this email often?
(Benefit of the doubt)

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 1:49 PM Nick Desaulniers
<ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Hello postmaster,
> Any thoughts on linux-toolchains@...r.kernel.org?
>
> On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 3:14 AM Nick Clifton <nickc@...hat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > >>>> Would it be possible to setup:
> > >>>> linux-tooling@...r.kernel.org
> >
> > >>> s/linux-tooling/linux-toolchains (better plural toolchains)
> >
> > >> FWIW FreeBSD names it "freebsd-toolchain".
> > >> NetBSD names it "tech-toolchain".
> > >>
> > >> I'd slightly prefer the singular form.
> >
> > > OK with singular form.
> > >
> > > I was thinking of GNU and LLVM toolchain*s* - that's why the plural.
> >
> > Personally I prefer the plural too, but it is not a big issue.
> >
> > I am however delighted that it looks like this idea will go ahead.
>
> --
> Thanks,
> ~Nick Desaulniers



-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers