[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200930200711.GA22586@amd>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2020 22:07:12 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
Raviteja Narayanam <raviteja.narayanam@...inx.com>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti.datta@...inx.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 144/245] serial: uartps: Wait for tx_empty in
console setup
Hi!
> From: Raviteja Narayanam <raviteja.narayanam@...inx.com>
>
> [ Upstream commit 42e11948ddf68b9f799cad8c0ddeab0a39da33e8 ]
>
> On some platforms, the log is corrupted while console is being
> registered. It is observed that when set_termios is called, there
> are still some bytes in the FIFO to be transmitted.
>
> So, wait for tx_empty inside cdns_uart_console_setup before calling
> set_termios.
> @@ -1246,6 +1247,13 @@ static int cdns_uart_console_setup(struct console *co, char *options)
> if (options)
> uart_parse_options(options, &baud, &parity, &bits, &flow);
>
> + /* Wait for tx_empty before setting up the console */
> + time_out = jiffies + usecs_to_jiffies(TX_TIMEOUT);
> +
> + while (time_before(jiffies, time_out) &&
> + cdns_uart_tx_empty(port) != TIOCSER_TEMT)
> + cpu_relax();
> +
So this is spinning for half a second. Could we use msleep(1) instead
of cpu_relax or something like that?
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (182 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists